That is very interesting. Does this mean that the typically recommended 2:1 ratio Calcium: magnesium isn't correct?
It's interesting, but it gets even better. Look what I found out:
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2767209http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00809042http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6930882http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1665466and previously given link:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/h705m74501n60305/and especially this one (page 53):
http://books.google.pl/books?id=NuEZZhoW4mcC&pg=PA54&dq=Beta+thalassemia+magnesium&ei=k8dEStrsNoSszgTM1JhkThese all pages say:
- Magnesium deficiency reduces antioxidant content in erythrocytes, what is not good for thals. If magnesium deficiency is really causing such a reduction as described in one of the above articles (superoxide dismutase lower by 32%), it would seem that it's better to supplement magnesium than take L-carnitine for example, as superoxide dismutase is most potent antioxidant there is and additionally you use your own body mechanisms which again is better, as there are no side effects, etc.
- Magnesium deficiency causes dehydration of erythroctyes.
- There is research going on concerning supplementation of magnesium in thalassemia and it confirms that magnesium deficiency is harmful.
Conclusion:
We have a possible new "miraculous cure", after wheatgrass, vitamin D, and so on...
I'm joking here a little, but it was "miraculous cure" for me and I think supplementation can really make a big difference.
But if serum magnisum in blood is not a reliable measure for magnisium what other tests should we do?Huh?Huh?Huh??
Well, that is exactly the problem.
I read somewhere that only a little part of body's magnesium is in blood, and to make things even worse kidneys try to keep this level at constant. So the level in other parts of body may be lower than in blood.
This is described here (however this page seems not to present scientific approach to the case, well, I don't know)
http://www.mgwater.com/laboratory_test.shtmlGood test for thals would be test of magnesium level in erythrocytes, but this is not widely available - I can't find any lab doing this test, but in these research papers this method is used.
Looks like the only method to deal with magnesium deficiency is supplementation on trial and error basis.
Beside being unable to test the deficiency there is still incomplete research pertaining to absorbability of different magnesium supplements - so even if you take magnesium carbonate or oxide (low absorbability) in recommended or even higher doses (recommended based on the content of magnesium in these supplements without taking into consideration absorbability), you will not replenish magnesium anyway. This was my case - I used to supplement magnesium, but to no effect.
Some guidelines in this matter:
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=416926and this book again (page 30):
http://books.google.pl/books?id=NuEZZhoW4mcC&pg=PA54&dq=Beta+thalassemia+magnesium&ei=k8dEStrsNoSszgTM1JhkThere are also magnesium sulfate shots - completely absorbable, but on prescription only, so you have to have low blood magnesium level, which may be a problem to "obtain", even if there is deficiency.
I don't know if you saw my recent post, but even after taking 2000 IU vitamin D daily since October, my level was only 19! (Normal range is 30-60 and I expect the low end is wrong). My doctor told me to raise it to 3000 IU daily and get tested again in six months. The itching interests me too, as it is a problem I also experience and not only in cold, dry weather. Maybe I should try magnesium supplements too.
If you are itching, magnesium supplementation is a good starting point. I would only recommend much higher doses at least at the beginning. I took three times the RDA, and it was magnesium citrate, so very well absorbable. As soon as I switched to cheaper brand (magnesium carbonate), the itching was starting to gain.
Magnesium soothens nerve cells, so that they do not overreact to normal incentives - this overreaction is felt as itching.
I used to take 10 000 IUs of vitamin D a day until I was quite sure that my level was OK. I calculated that in order to raise my blood level by 7, I have to take 100 000 IUs (you can calculate how much you have to take based on the data for the period since October).
So the calculation was simple - I had to raise my blood level by 35, so I had to take overall 500 000 IUs. In order not to do this for a 1000 days with the dose of 500 IUs a day (ridiculous!), I decided to take 10 000 a day, and in 50 days my treatment was over.
I hope I explained this well.
Anyway, if it is possible to suppres parathyroid by taking magnesium (in order to avoid hypercalcemia), taking high doses of vitamin D seems more feasible now than ever.
Waiting on your comments.
B.