Hi baloch
I get the feeling that you are somehow confused about the techniques or protocols concerning transplants in general.
Generally speaking in transplants, you need to inject the patient with normal and matched stem cells. The sources of these stem cells vary.They can be taken from the bone marow of the donor and eventually this is called Bone marrow transplant. Or you can have them from the umblical cord of a baby (these kind of cells are characterised by not being so resistant to the host(patient) and therefore lowering GVHD, but the disadvantage is that they are quiet few in quantity as the cord blood does not have a lot of stem cells compared to other sources.) In this case the transplant is called cord blood transpalnt. The other source of stem cells could be directly coming from the donor blood stream through injecting the donor by certain drugs that increase the quantity of stem cells in the blood stream so they can be collected. In this case the transplant is called Stem cell transplant.
So the above explains all the possible sources in obtaining stem cells. But these stem cells have to match with the patients HLA type. So if the stem cells of the donor and the patient (host) match exactly, we call this 100% HLA matched. But still some transplants succeed without having 100% match . So there is a range for this match, but the closest the match the more sucesseful is the transplant because you reduce the risk that GVHS occurs ( this means when the stem cells start to attack the patient instead of curing)
How these stem cells are injected, which drugs used before and after transplant, kind and quantity of chemotherapy before transpalnt...... all these are called protocol and this is what differniate a center from another and this what makes the variation of success rate from one center to another. Every center or hospital has a certain technique or protocol to follow.
The article you posted was highlightening a certain techique or a different protocol which is the usage of certain drugs that lowers the immune system only instead of using chemotherapy. The advantage of this is that the side effects are gentler than those of the chemotharapy. Dr Krishnmaurti is the pioneer in using this technique. At the same time more transpalnts were done using chemotherapy than this technique and the advantage of this is that you have a big number of operations done in the world by this way and this allows you to have statistics in order to weigh your pros and cons
Results of ANY transplant:
1-Success..the marrow of the patient is 100% made from the donor cells which is called 100% engrafment (the patient is cured and can have some side effect that lie in a range)
2- Mixed chimerism (this happenes when the marrow of the patient and the donor co-exist peacefully togather but the part of the donor is able to produce ''good'' blood allowing the patient to be independant of transfusions. Thsi mixed chimerism is supposed to continue through all the life of the patient in order to consider him/her cured
3- Rejection (the patient rejects the donor cells and he/she is back to thal)
4- Failure (it is the same as rejection but could be accompanied with severe GVHD that could be fatal in some patients.)
The bad thing about transplant in general is that you don't choose or know which result you are going to end. Of courese the doctor will tell the percentage of sucess or failure according to each case, but there is no a concrete gurantee
There are a lot of variable that play a role in increasing the success rate
1- Patient's health from all aspects ( ferritin, hepatits, antibodies, liver, heart, kidney functions.....)
2- HLA match ( the more the match the better the results and less side effects)
3- Expierence of the transplant center
4- When all the above points are present, the age would be a minor variable. But if the above points are not well taken of and the patient is some how ''old'' , then at this point, age matters
Manal