I'm probably not going to say anything you haven't heard before. Accepted practice is to not transfuse at Hb of 8. The risks from iron, antibody reactions, and even a minute chance of acquiring disease outweigh the benefits of transfusion. Other than low Hb you should experience only mild symptoms...and so on. HbH is often compared to non-transfusing beta intermedia. Take folic acid. Have a good day.
Hi Andy, regardless if I might have heard some or all of this before or not, I really appreciate hearing from you anyhow and seeing how other patients with varying degrees of thalassemia have coped and have managed to make their decisions regarding transfusion therapy.
Yes, I have always been told the same things and I myself fully understand the risks involved and this was a major reason I never did any regular transfusions growing up. My own (and my family's) concerns about the risks along with what the doctors kept insisting (you should be fine without, transfusions are very risky, etc) was enough to scare me and my family away from them.
Take folic acid every day and have a good day IS exactly the response I have been given for all of my life, regardless of how I have felt.
Well, it's nice to have standards and measurements of Hb and analysis of genetic mutations and what your specific mutation should mean, but does anyone try to measure the true quality of life of patients or all patients lumped together by mutation and Hb level and assumed that they are all the same? And as more patients are observed over time, is there any adjustment made to prior notions of what to expect in an individual patient? And is there ever any consideration that people are individuals and combinations of certain traits in a patient might lead to a lower quality of life? And if HbH is similar to non-transfusing beta intermedias, should more consideration to transfuse be given as patients get older, as is the case with beta intermedia? And shouldn't the doctors be asking some of these questions?
Yes, yes, a thousand times yes.
Where I do not believe in transfusion therapy or any other thal-related therapy being taken lightly (they can be VERY life-altering decisions which I fully respect), I believe that patients are all individuals and that nobody nowhere is going to have the exact same experiences with thal and that the medical profession needs to be more open minded about evaluating these experiences.
My own experiences with HbH have been more severe than most according to the hematologists I have seen in the past, but they are also more inclined to attribute the symptoms to things other than thal and I suspect that is because my symptoms are falling outside of what is considered "normal". There is resistance, in my opinion and experience, to accept that there is a possibility of varying degrees of anemia and anemia-related problems for certain types of anemias - alpha thal, HbH being one of them and quite possibly/probably beta thalassemia intermedia.
My own primary care doctor goes by the patient and not necessarily by the "rules of thumb" and so has kept track of my health in lots of detail. He knows what he sees, but he is not a hematologist and admits to such and so prefers to defer advice to a hematologist and that has been where my frustrations have really come to fruit.
When it comes down to it, there aren't many options with HbH. Folic acid. A good diet and a good multivitamin. Live with it. Or make a decision that you want to experience life with a normal Hb level and pursue a goal of transfusing, and see if you can get your doctor to agree to at least occasional transfusions. I will say that I have heard from adult beta intermedias who started to transfuse later in life and once they did, wished they had started a lot sooner, because their quality of life was so improved. I do think it's a big decision and acceptance of chelation will have to be a given. I also wonder if it would help your case if your doctor was to write to Dr Vichinsky at CHO and describe your physical condition when you've been examined and ask if the deterioration in health would indicate a need for a new evaluation and if transfusions might be indicated even with an Hb of 8.
Everyone says to choose the path of safety, the path of least resistance - avoid getting transfused and avoid the dangers and risks that come with regular transfusion therapy - and I have, for nearly 30 years now... but especially in the last 5 years, it just gets worse and worse and worse.
After eating well, taking all my supplements and then some, avoiding all the oxidative foods and then some, trying to take care of myself and not over exhaust myself all of my life, my health and quality of life has overall started deteriorating over the years.
It's a big decision - a potentially life changing decision - when it comes to transfusion therapy and I know it is and I would avoid it if possible... but I don't think avoidance is the answer anymore.
Not if I want to become fully independent. Not if I want to be able to function more productively in my life and not constantly worry about getting sick and then having to sit out for weeks at a time to let my body recuperate.
Unfortunately... "do not transfuse" is still the answer that is being pushed along with "you're not taking care of yourself", "your problems must have some other reason" etc and I feel invalidated and even stupid at times for even considering such an option.
Because I only have HbH and shouldn't be having these problems that people with more severe forms of thal have.
But I will take your advice and ask my doctor and see if he will write me that letter to Dr. Vichinsky.
When I went to CHO, I wasn't seen by Dr. Vichinsky even though I was seen in their Thalassemia Center. The multiple times I went, I was always deferred to another doctor and to even their nurse practitioners even though my appointment was for Dr. Vichinsky.
... Do you think being seen by Dr. Vichinsky himself will help or at least help me find answers and help me in trying to make a life-altering decision or is it better to not hope and just "wait and see"?
I don't know how much of this list you've seen before but we have a list of things to avoid with alpha thal. I also want to mention that I am noting more and more references to beans and legumes in general as foods some alpha thals should avoid, and not just fava beans. It might be worth it to try avoiding any type of beans and products containing any bean or legume, although with the amount of soy used in foods this may be difficult, for a month or so, to see if there is any noticeable difference.
http://www.thalassemiapatientsandfriends.com/index.php?topic=3410.msg34830#msg34830
Funny you should mention this; legumes - including peanuts - oftentimes give me unexplained side pains where my spleen is.
I will look at the list; thank you for providing it and thank you for your thoughts in general.