Over the years I have thought about this idea, I entertain it for a while and then wonder if it has any merit. Several years ago, a hemophilia patient - following a liver transplant found himself cured of hemophilia because the liver was able to produce the clotting factor which he lacked.
This lead me to think whether the spleen, which is capable of extramedullary hematopoiesis may be helpful in the same way. In fact, there may be two ways that it may be helpful. Firstly, introducing donor cells into the spleen may create enough red blood cell production to reduce if not eliminate the requirement for transfusions. Cells from the spleen often engraft in the bone marrow, where they would continue to create more red blood cells. Also, the spleen being a significant part of the immune system, having accepted the donor cells would largely eliminate chances of the rest of the body rejecting donor cells. This tendency brings me to the second way in which introduction of cells into the spleen may have some benefit. If the spleen has accepted the donor cells, but the hematopoiesis is not adequate to resolve the anemia completely - at that time a bone marrow transplant from the same donor (donor of spleen cells) may be more successful because the spleen and immune system have already accepted this donor as 'self'. My hope being that the bmt not be required, and the tissue transplant to the spleen would be enough.... Sometimes I wonder if a spleen transplant would be helpful.
I know that the spleen is not a vital organ for survival, which is why spleen transplants have not been investigated but in thalassemia and sickle cell anemia it could be beneficial in more ways than one...the faulty, enlarged spleen would be removed - an healthy, donor spleen would be transplanted possibly restoring normal immune function to the recipient, reducing the risk of clots and destruction of red blood cells and possibly resolving their thalassemia or sickle cell anemia....
Am I the only one who is able to see the potential in this?
Sharmin